On June 5, 2026, the Ohio Board of Professional Conduct (the “Board”) issued Opinion 2026-02, clarifying when Ohio law firms may use separately registered trade names or “doing business as” (DBA) names in their marketing and other public-facing communications. This opinion offers answers to questions left open by prior guidance. This
We previously discussed whether lawyers can withdraw from a representation simply because they want to and withdrawing would not have a materially adverse impact on the client (think hot potato). But what happens when the lawyer is representing the client before a tribunal? What can lawyers disclose when they have made the
Think your conversations with ChatGPT or Claude are just between you and the machine? Think again.
A groundbreaking ruling out of New York just changed the game for anyone using AI tools to discuss legal matters. In United States v. Bradley Heppner, No. 25 Cr. 503 (S.D.N.Y.), Judge Rakoff of the Southern District of
What’s worse than having a client go elsewhere, and then ask you to spend time helping your replacement? Yesterday (January 21, 2026), the American Bar Association’s Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility issued Formal Opinion 520, clarifying the extent to which Model Rule 1.16(d) requires attorneys to convey information to a former
AI transcription tools that record, transcribe, and summarize calls are attractive to lawyers and clients alike and are becoming ubiquitous in some circles. But lawyers must take care to use these tools ethically and avoid pitfalls that could compromise privilege and confidentiality. The New York City Bar Association’s Professional Ethics Committee recently issued Formal Opinion
As we welcome 2026 with high hopes and new resolutions, let’s review some highlights from 2025 and consider practices that should be carried forward into the new year and those which should be left behind.
Ethics Opinions Issued in 2025
In Texas Ethics Opinion 701, the Professional Ethics Committee concluded that an attorney
The District of Columbia Bar recently issued Ethics Opinion 391, providing insight as to ethical issues lawyers and law firms should bear in mind when considering agreements with government entities. While the Opinion specifically analyzes the DC Rules of Professional Conduct, versions of the same three rules raised are found in nearly every state.
We recently discussed the ethics rules that lawyers must bear in mind when trying to attract new clients through social media channels. Practitioners may find it difficult to avoid social media in their daily practice. There are many traps for the unwary when using social media in the context of litigation. It is worthwhile for
Lawyers sometimes forget that, as the American Bar Association has noted, we cannot “take off the lawyer hat” to circumvent ethics rules. Likewise, lawyers are not any less susceptible to discipline for ethics violations just because their conduct takes place on social media instead of the courtroom. These are important rules to keep in
The North Carolina Business Court recently issued an order revoking the pro hac vice admission of a Florida attorney and barring him from practicing in North Carolina courts for an entire year. The order arose from a series of misrepresentations and failures to correct inaccuracies made in connection with pro hac vice applications, as well